rosalarian:

Angelina Jolie had a double mastectomy, in case you hadn’t heard. How dare she remove those ticking time bombs from her chest, amiright? Like, hasn’t she learned by now that her body is public domain and we all get to vote on what she does with it? Sheesh, how selfish can ya get.

(Source: maudit, via cerebus92)

Here’s the third page from my story for the Voices Against Bullying anthology. I wasn’t going to show any more of this just yet, but this page is so much better than the previous two that I couldn’t hold off. There’s a weird kind of alchemy at work when you draw comics on a regular basis. Something eventually clicks and your pages get dramatically better. I wish I could bottle it. I think in this case there are three things at work: First, I’m mostly over a case of bursitis that has been plaguing the elbow of my drawing arm. Second, I’ve regained enough freedom of movement to go back to drawing with a brush. Third, I think I hit the critical mass point where improvement comes in bunches. I remember the last time that happened to me. The results were dramatic. Anyway, enjoy. (via Christianne’s Art and Comics: Voices Against Bullying, Page 3)

Here’s the third page from my story for the Voices Against Bullying anthology. I wasn’t going to show any more of this just yet, but this page is so much better than the previous two that I couldn’t hold off. There’s a weird kind of alchemy at work when you draw comics on a regular basis. Something eventually clicks and your pages get dramatically better. I wish I could bottle it. I think in this case there are three things at work: First, I’m mostly over a case of bursitis that has been plaguing the elbow of my drawing arm. Second, I’ve regained enough freedom of movement to go back to drawing with a brush. Third, I think I hit the critical mass point where improvement comes in bunches. I remember the last time that happened to me. The results were dramatic. Anyway, enjoy. (via Christianne’s Art and Comics: Voices Against Bullying, Page 3)


“I do feel like the same director [who made Shivers and The Fly], though more mature and more confident in my filmmaking. But I’ve done certain things and I don’t feel the need to do them again. I don’t mean that in terms of genre. I don’t think: I must never do another horror film because I’m a more established artist. I wouldn’t hesitate to do another horror film if it was interesting enough. But a lot of the things proposed to me are so influenced by my earlier work that it would feel like a remake. In fact, remakes of most of my movies have been suggested. That’s not gonna happen. But I haven’t turned my back on genre filmmaking, it’s just that I don’t want to bore myself.”
David CronenbergBorn March 15, 1943

“I do feel like the same director [who made Shivers and The Fly], though more mature and more confident in my filmmaking. But I’ve done certain things and I don’t feel the need to do them again. I don’t mean that in terms of genre. I don’t think: I must never do another horror film because I’m a more established artist. I wouldn’t hesitate to do another horror film if it was interesting enough. But a lot of the things proposed to me are so influenced by my earlier work that it would feel like a remake. In fact, remakes of most of my movies have been suggested. That’s not gonna happen. But I haven’t turned my back on genre filmmaking, it’s just that I don’t want to bore myself.”

David Cronenberg
Born March 15, 1943

(Source: strangewood, via oldfilmsflicker)

(via Christianne’s Art and Comics: Voices Against Bullying)

I’m contributing to an anthology about bullying this month. These are the first two pages of my story. Pitt pens on Bristol board with digital lettering. The title font is Benguat Frisky. Everything else comes from Blambot. This will run five pages. I probably won’t post much more than this, since this is going to be published. Should be out sometime in June. I’m still working on The Exile, btw, but I’ve had a couple of setbacks with that story. I hope to have it finished by the end of May.

How Big A Factor…?

gailsimone:

Just wondering what goes into your decision to purchase a comic at a comics store? For this question, I am only talking about buying a comic off the rack at the comics shop, please.

How important is:

The cover?

The artwork?

The writer’s name?

The publisher?

The genre?

The lead character (s)?

Whether or not the story is an ‘event’ comic?

Hmm…This isn’t something that’s easy for me to answer, so I’ll take it piece  by piece:

Cover: My knee jerk reaction is that covers don’t sway me because I’ve been burned by fabulous covers around crappy comics often enough. But that would be wrong. I started buying Mark Waid’s Daredevil on the basis of the covers and frankly didn’t care whether what was inside was good. Those covers were that good. In fact, Marvel elbowed itself back onto my pull list after almost a decade on the basis of its graphic design, which is so, so much better than DC these days that it’s not even worth comparing.

The Artwork: This is hugely important to me. I know that comics have become something of a writer’s medium these days, but there are plenty of writers who’ve been let down by bad art. Some artists are auto-buys for me, no matter who the writer is. A good example: Batwoman, which has indifferent writing but is one of the best books of the stands on the strength of its visuals. I would buy empty cereal cartons if they had Moebius drawings on them.

The Writer: Writers seem to me to be more variable than artists, so even though there are a very small number of writers who are auto-buys for me, I’m more inclined to wait on a recommendation.

Publisher: I almost put down “I don’t care,” but that’s not true. I’m deeply suspicious of the business practices of the big two. I’m much more inclined to buy a creator-owned book than one that’s owned by a corporation.

Genre: Don’t care. Gimme a western. Gimme a romance. Gimme a horror story. Gimme a crime story. It’s all good.

Lead Character: depends on the creator. I’m predisposed to like certain characters like anyone, but that doesn’t mean I’m going to buy a Swamp Thing book drawn by, say, Greg Land or Jim Balent.

Event comics: This is a fast way to get me NOT to buy a comic. I HATE big crossover stories and think most one-off events are marketing gimmicks rather than sound storytelling. Screw events.

Looking at The Awakening (2012) on my movie blog today. With Rebecca Hall, not Charlton Heston, which is all to the good. Plus poetry quotations!

I also like this film’s heroine. Florence Cathcart is what would have been called a “new woman” in 1921, one who wears pants and smokes cigarettes and doesn’t care if it’s “proper” for a lady. She’s educated, too, and the best in her chosen field. The film has a sub-theme dedicated to what happens when such a woman bumps up against institutional patriarchy, though it ultimately doesn’t figure in the denouement. And I like the actors. I can watch Rebecca Hall in anything. It’s fun watching Dominic West play against type as a haunted school teacher.

My iTunes is killing it this morning

This is what it queued up to start the day:


Rid of Me—PJ Harvey

Androgynous—The Replacements

Red House—Jimi Hendrix

Nothing But a Heartache—The Flirtations

Ants In My Pants—James Brown

This Tornado Loves You—Neko Case

Let it Rain—Dream Syndicate

Don’t Stop the Dance—Bryan Ferry

You’re a Big Girl Now—Bob Dylan

You’re No Rock and Roll Fun—Sleater Kinney

Exit Through the Air Vent—Man or Astroman

Surprised there’s no Johnny Cash. My iTunes loves Johnny Cash, usually.

darylelockhart:

Thanks for sparking our imaginations, Ray.

RIP Ray Harryhausen (1920-2013)

via teleportcity

(via gabzilla-z)

amyreeder:

BIG NEWS: Brandon Montclare and I JUST launched a Kickstarter!!!  For our new creator-owned SERIES Rocket Girl.  Check it out!!!!! 
THIS TIME WITH A LINK, GO ME: http://kck.st/108y2Tr

I don’t envy Amy and Brandon for going online the day after Greg Rucka and Rick Burchett’s Lady Sabre Kickstarter (which is sucking all the oxygen out of the room). But Halloween Eve was awesome, and this looks awesome, too. Now if I only had some money right now….

amyreeder:

BIG NEWS: Brandon Montclare and I JUST launched a Kickstarter!!!  For our new creator-owned SERIES Rocket Girl.  Check it out!!!!! 

THIS TIME WITH A LINK, GO ME: http://kck.st/108y2Tr

I don’t envy Amy and Brandon for going online the day after Greg Rucka and Rick Burchett’s Lady Sabre Kickstarter (which is sucking all the oxygen out of the room). But Halloween Eve was awesome, and this looks awesome, too.

Now if I only had some money right now….

ruckawriter:

The text of our first official Kickstarter Campaign Update!

cinephilearchive:

Cronenberg on Cronenberg. He’s given 3sat an interview in which he looks back on his major features over the course of 90 minutes.

Cronenberg is one of the most articulate filmmakers there is when discussing his own work. Well worth the watch.

Looking at Room 237 on my movie blog today.

There’s a word for the psychological effect that causes people to see Jesus in a piece of toast. It’s called “pareidolia”, and it’s the reason that you can look at the grille of a car and see a human face staring back at you. The human brain likes to see patterns, particularly patterns that it recognizes. This is not necessarily a bad thing. Seeing a purposive universe is a key to the development of science, even if that purposive nature to the universe is an illusion created by the way our brains are wired. Unfortunately, that same pattern recognition feature can become a bug when you can’t turn it off. I was thinking about this while I was watching Room 237 (2012, directed by Rodney Ascher), in which five people descant on the “meaning” of Stanley Kubrick’s The Shining while trawling through the minutia of the film. Now, I shouldn’t throw rocks. I occasionally see things in films that other people don’t. Hell, that’s what the movie-o-sphere on the internet is for. But I generally don’t take the kinds of cognitive leaps that leads the commenters in Room 237 to their conclusions.

(via display_image.php (JPEG Image, 879 × 1062 pixels))
“Mrs. Cecilia Ward” by John Singer Sargent
Every time I go to the Nelson Atkins Museum in Kansas City, I wind up standing in front of this painting with my mouth hanging open. The Nelson has a TON of amazing art, but for some reason, this one always grabs my attention. Seeing it online is almost a comedown, because you just can’t capture the brush strokes with pixels.

(via display_image.php (JPEG Image, 879 × 1062 pixels))

“Mrs. Cecilia Ward” by John Singer Sargent

Every time I go to the Nelson Atkins Museum in Kansas City, I wind up standing in front of this painting with my mouth hanging open. The Nelson has a TON of amazing art, but for some reason, this one always grabs my attention. Seeing it online is almost a comedown, because you just can’t capture the brush strokes with pixels.

nprfreshair:

It is nasty out today in Philadelphia. Rain, wind, puddles, general unpleasantness. Looking at some of the paintings from this show of John Singer Sargent watercolors at the Brooklyn Museum, however, makes it all seem a little less bleak. They’re lovely. If I were going to be in New York this weekend, I would go to there.
The New York Times:

Sargent detractors who think he was a gifted technician but lacked imagination and formal rigor may profit from re-examining their prejudices in light of his watercolors, his freshest and most authentic work. The show won’t alter the basic conventional wisdom, but it does offer a good opportunity to consider knotty questions like: Was Sargent a modern artist?
He was modern in the sense that he revealed the processes of painting, unlike conservative academicians who preferred to hide their tricks behind veils of illusion. Because of its transparency watercolor has a certain intelligibility; you can see the artist thinking, deciding and constructing the work.

Corfu: Lights and Shadows, 1909 by John Singer Sargent

nprfreshair:

It is nasty out today in Philadelphia. Rain, wind, puddles, general unpleasantness. Looking at some of the paintings from this show of John Singer Sargent watercolors at the Brooklyn Museum, however, makes it all seem a little less bleak. They’re lovely. If I were going to be in New York this weekend, I would go to there.

The New York Times:

Sargent detractors who think he was a gifted technician but lacked imagination and formal rigor may profit from re-examining their prejudices in light of his watercolors, his freshest and most authentic work. The show won’t alter the basic conventional wisdom, but it does offer a good opportunity to consider knotty questions like: Was Sargent a modern artist?

He was modern in the sense that he revealed the processes of painting, unlike conservative academicians who preferred to hide their tricks behind veils of illusion. Because of its transparency watercolor has a certain intelligibility; you can see the artist thinking, deciding and constructing the work.

Corfu: Lights and Shadows, 1909 by John Singer Sargent